A Marriage Agreement

conjugal union, as they say, takes two to organise. Gender roles should non exist in trade union because it would moreover bring conflicts to the relationship. Couples need to become partners maculation still master(prenominal)taining their individuality. They need to learn how to feign decisions with the other person in mind. If not, the union will most likely move well-nigh into a divorce with the couple cerebration that this is the best solution.Alix Kates Shulman, in her essay entitle A Marriage Agreement, believes that everything can be worked out if couples only k red-hot how to work around each other. She proves this by presenting the audience with their Marriage Agreement in which both she and her preserve explicitly detail each others chores and responsibility.The reference admits that the proportionateness was a little globe however, it worked for their coupling (p. 181), and this is what is important. The couple decided to chance upon an treaty after real izing that they ask crowing too accustomed to their everyday chores wherein the married woman did everything from taking care of the children to cleaning the syndicate while the husband spends time aside from his family to make some money.This is what most couples have become, which makes their marriage fall apart. Shulman writes how verbal agreement to delegate tasks and divide duties will not work and that a written agreement will make it easier for couples to adjust to the new divisions of their responsibilities.However as good as the origins narration of how they delegated the tasks, for overall forte of convincing readers of the effectivity of much(prenominal) delegacy the author must present demonstration and comparison of the advantages of such agreements. The essay patently indicates in passing the effectiveness of such delegations without further proof or set and therefore, becomes weak in persuading its readers.The main bind starts off with introducing the curr ent situation of marriage life in America. It starts off by imprinting an image to the readers on how overworked and cockeyed the delegation of domestic responsibilities is towards women. It was presented in a way that is very donnish stating statistics and quoting researches.This acts as a clear introduction of the feature authors feminist involve of how household responsibilities must be shared among spouses. The article then goes on say how better it is for families that do not come about the traditional delegation of household work than those who are not willing to share the duties and responsibilities of taking care of home and family (p.179). both these up to this point were presented in a very clear manner with the clothed of the author to convince her audience of how communion responsibilities is beneficial to marriage life introduced smoothly.However, from this academic level of businessation, the article presents an essay that is a personal account of a marriage life. This essay is supposedly the main argument of the article but for some reason, it does not provide much strength to the state arguments. Rather, it simply gives a glimpse of how to permeate evenly responsibilities without much proof of its effectivity. This is the main flaw of the essay as it does not strengthen the main article.